Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Ew! There's a Dead Chicken in My Chicken Soup: The Cognitive Dissonance of Disgust


This is an open letter to Nicole Montgomery, a.k.a., the lady who discovered what looked like a chicken embryo in her chicken soup.


Hello, Nicole!

You don’t know me but I saw your video online last week, you know, the one with the alarming chicken part in your Campbell’s Chicken and Stars soup. I have to admit, it was kind of a shocker. By that, I mean that I found it kind of shocking that you were shocked. But then I realized that, yeah, you were not expecting to see that. I can forget sometimes that people have what seems to be irrational standards of what they do and don’t want to see when it comes to what they eat. You told the reporter, "I opened it up, and there was this speck in there -- I was like, 'What is that?' I looked a little bit closer and I was like, 'Oh, that looks like a dead chicken.'”

You did realize that there were dead chicken pieces inside that can of soup when you bought it, right?

I know that seeing that embryonic shape was not exactly what you were expecting but the other various chicken parts in the soup that you were going to feed your daughter were probably not much older than an embryo, most likely barely over six weeks of age when slaughtered. Still, I imagine that you might have been relieved to hear that what you discovered probably wasn’t an embryo. According to an employee from the lab that analyzed the “strange object” in question, you can rest assured that, “The odds are it’s just a veiny portion of the chicken. Those chickens are going to be pretty much de-boned and emptied before they’re ever taken apart to go into a soup product.” 


That can of soup product likely just had a more veiny than usual piece of chicken flesh bobbing around in it. That’s supposed to be a reassuring.

 
I am curious, though: Was it the little body-shape that unsettled you the most? Was it that it drew your attention to something that you’d rather not think about when you eat or feed your child? I mean, the soup you purchased is called Campbell’s Chicken and Stars Soup. There is no fraud about what’s in it. (Oh, except the stars part.) I’m guessing that you were expecting the flesh to be in uniform little off-white chunks and seeing that unexpected veiny piece resembling an embryo was a disturbing moment. I don’t blame you for being disgusted, honestly. The food industry does such an excellent job of keeping us from remembering what we’re eating that when the usual obfuscation around a dead body is removed, it can be a pretty shocking moment. 


I am going to ask you to think about using that disgust and shock and turn your experience into something very different than just a sensationalist news story that is quickly forgotten. I am going to ask you to consider turning that disgust and shock into something that can transform the world. 

We shouldn’t be comfortable with eating anything that we wouldn’t want to eat before being “de-boned” and “emptied.” We shouldn’t be comfortable with eating anything that must be presented in a particular way in order for us to not lose our appetites. Your gut reaction told you that this was something to not feed your child. Every time that veil is lifted, it’s an opportunity. The veiny piece that managed to make it through the machinery to appear in your can of soup was a gift, really. It was a chance to wake up, face reality and refuse to accept what we know is not fit for consumption.



Maybe we feel it’s not fit for consumption because it disgusts us. Maybe we feel it’s not fit for consumption because it unnerves us. Maybe we feel it’s not fit for consumption because it reminds us of something that we’d rather not think about. Whatever is the impetus, I hope you will use that and continue to question the status quo about what you want to support and what you don’t want to support. Birds, fish, pigs, cows: they are are made with blood and bones, organs, skin, cartilage and, yes, veins, just as we are. The only way to forget that is to take apart the body in a specific way. Getting the animal parts into soup cans and stomachs is a necessarily violent process and it’s naïve of us to expect it to be a bloodless journey stripped of all viscera.

So, Nicole, I am asking you, mother to mother, woman to woman, person to person, to do something different. Ask questions. Take this opportunity to think and expand beyond where you were before you opened that can of soup. This matters. This means something. It’s up to you, now, to not deny your gut. No one should silence their discomfort with eating death, whether the veins show or not.


All the best,



Marla

15 comments:

  1. Such a powerful post, Marla. My moment was while reading "Eating Animals" and see the square that represented space chickens have in a factory farm. Total paradigm shift for me. Blew my mind and my world open.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent post! Absolutely spot on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post! My moment was seeing a video of Little Miss Sunshine on Edgar Mission's Internet page, followed by Eating Animals. I really had my eyes opened!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The sheer truth ! Thanks for this posting,I´ve shared it on my educational blog and on my Facebook as well !

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great article. I cannot blame Nicole for having this reaction as many people have this same 'veil' over their faces. But as you mentioned, this is a great opportunity to think a little deeper about this and actually realise what it truly is that she is mortified by.....and that is the fact that she is eating an animal that was once a living creature. My moment was when I visited Edgar's Mission over a year ago and learnt of the horrors of factory farming. I have been vegan since that day and am happier than ever xx

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great article... this articulates so many things that I am upset about daily. I work at an omnivore restaurant, unfortunately, and I see this dissonance daily... from guests asking for their eggs to be scrambled well done because the texture makes them squeamish, to guests sending back burgers twice because they couldn't stomach a little bit of pink in the meat. I almost, almost lost it and told them to order a veggie burger the second time as they were squicked out by the fact that meat contains flesh.... but I need this job temporarily.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good job! Now... Can we do something to address that ugly floating hunk of pork fat that's in other wise vegan beans??? I've written to the Bush company and told them if they just quit including that piece of yuck they'd double their market. There's lots of groups that just don't eat *pigs* too. Sigh. Such disconnect by consumers and resistance from corporate food giants.

    May the only "stars" that chickens see be under the heavenly sky in a free and compassionate world. Yeah.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you, Laryssa! I have yet to read "Eating Animals." I've got to fix that. Thank you for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you for sharing, Wendy, and for letting me know about Edgar's Mission. Looks like a wonderful place and resource!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thank you for your kind words, Drak Druk, and for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you for sharing, Kathy B., and I agree 100%. What a great opportunity to change and grow. How wonderful that you were courageous enough to connect the dots once you couldn't hide from the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thank you, Anonymous. It is baffling and strange the hoops people will jump through to keep from being reminded about what they are eating. Here's to you finding a job that is a better fit for you! We've all been there. :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you, Bea! It's like when Chipotle had bacon in their pinto beans but finally had to admit, you know what, there's no need for it to be in there. I wish that the rest of the food industry would also reevaluate.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.